0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.16 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 1200 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 13:32:03 EDT 2021 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.37 % Number of cores: 8 0.16/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.16/0.38 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.23/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.23/0.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.41/0.61 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d 0.41/0.61 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. 0.41/0.61 # 0.41/0.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.081 s 0.41/0.61 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.41/0.61 0.41/0.61 # Proof found! 0.41/0.61 # SZS status Theorem 0.41/0.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.41/0.61 thf(fact_5_strict__not__refl__weak, axiom, ![X119:a, X11:a]:((~(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X11 @ X119) @ relation)<=>(~(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X11 @ X119) @ relation)&member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X119 @ X11) @ relation))<=(member_a @ X119 @ carrier&member_a @ X11 @ carrier)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_5_strict__not__refl__weak)). 0.41/0.61 thf(conj_3, conjecture, (member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ x @ y) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ y @ x) @ relation), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_3)). 0.41/0.61 thf(conj_1, hypothesis, member_a @ y @ carrier, file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_1)). 0.41/0.61 thf(conj_0, hypothesis, member_a @ x @ carrier, file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X119:a, X11:a]:((member_a @ X119 @ carrier&member_a @ X11 @ carrier)=>(~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X11 @ X119) @ relation<=>(~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X11 @ X119) @ relation&member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X119 @ X11) @ relation))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_5_strict__not__refl__weak])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X2225:a, X2226:a]:(((~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2226 @ X2225) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2226 @ X2225) @ relation|(~member_a @ X2225 @ carrier|~member_a @ X2226 @ carrier))&(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2225 @ X2226) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2226 @ X2225) @ relation|(~member_a @ X2225 @ carrier|~member_a @ X2226 @ carrier)))&(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2226 @ X2225) @ relation|~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2225 @ X2226) @ relation|~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X2226 @ X2225) @ relation|(~member_a @ X2225 @ carrier|~member_a @ X2226 @ carrier))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ x @ y) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ y @ x) @ relation)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_3])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X7:a, X11:a]:(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X7 @ X11) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X11 @ X7) @ relation|~member_a @ X7 @ carrier|~member_a @ X11 @ carrier), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_8, hypothesis, member_a @ y @ carrier, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ x @ y) @ relation&~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ y @ x) @ relation), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_10, hypothesis, ![X7:a]:(member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ X7 @ y) @ relation|member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ y @ X7) @ relation|~member_a @ X7 @ carrier), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_11, hypothesis, member_a @ x @ carrier, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ x @ y) @ relation, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~member449909584od_a_a @ (product_Pair_a_a @ y @ x) @ relation, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.41/0.61 thf(c_0_14, hypothesis, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), c_0_13]), ['proof']). 0.41/0.61 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.41/0.61 # Proof object total steps : 15 0.41/0.61 # Proof object clause steps : 7 0.41/0.61 # Proof object formula steps : 8 0.41/0.61 # Proof object conjectures : 5 0.41/0.61 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2 0.41/0.61 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.41/0.61 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5 0.41/0.61 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4 0.41/0.61 # Proof object generating inferences : 2 0.41/0.61 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2 0.41/0.61 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.41/0.61 # Parsed axioms : 531 0.41/0.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.41/0.61 # Initial clauses : 839 0.41/0.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 200 0.41/0.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 639 0.41/0.61 # Processed clauses : 1531 0.41/0.61 # ...of these trivial : 56 0.41/0.61 # ...subsumed : 246 0.41/0.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 1229 0.41/0.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 124 0.41/0.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.41/0.61 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.41/0.61 # Backward-rewritten : 21 0.41/0.61 # Generated clauses : 1928 0.41/0.61 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1422 0.41/0.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.41/0.61 # Paramodulations : 1698 0.41/0.61 # Factorizations : 0 0.41/0.61 # NegExts : 0 0.41/0.61 # Equation resolutions : 137 0.41/0.61 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional check models : 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.41/0.61 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.41/0.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 629 0.41/0.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 225 0.41/0.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.41/0.61 # Negative unit clauses : 31 0.41/0.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 373 0.41/0.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 999 0.41/0.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 2044 0.41/0.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.41/0.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 572 0.41/0.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 100801 0.41/0.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66865 0.41/0.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 198 0.41/0.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8050 0.41/0.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.41/0.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 61 0.41/0.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 19 0.41/0.61 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.41/0.61 # Condensation successes : 0 0.41/0.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 87677 0.41/0.62 0.41/0.62 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.41/0.62 # User time : 0.226 s 0.41/0.62 # System time : 0.011 s 0.41/0.62 # Total time : 0.237 s 0.41/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2920 pages 0.41/0.62 EOF